The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, explained
Start the free assessment Free, about 10 to 15 minutes
Short answer
The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test is a research task, revised in 2001 by Simon Baron-Cohen and colleagues, that shows 36 photos of the eye region and asks which of four words best describes the person's thought or feeling. Autistic adults scored lower on average in early studies, but it is not an autism test, and recent research questions what it measures.
The Eyes Test is one of the most famous tasks in autism research and one of the most shared online quizzes. People often come to it expecting an autism test with eyes, and leave with a score and no clear idea of what it means. The short version: it was designed to study a skill researchers call mentalizing, not to diagnose anyone, and its meaning is more debated today than it was 20 years ago.
What the test involves
- Full name
- "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test, revised version
- Developers
- Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Hill J, Raste Y, Plumb I
- Published
- Original 1997; revised version 2001, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
- Format
- 36 photographs showing only the eye region, each with four word choices
- Score
- Number correct, out of 36
- Purpose
- Research measure of recognizing mental states from limited cues
How it relates to autism
Average group differences do not translate into individual results. Many autistic adults score in the typical range, and many non-autistic people score low. The test was never given a diagnostic cut-off, and no clinical guideline recommends it for diagnosing autism.
What research says about validity
Over the past decade, researchers have raised serious questions about what the Eyes Test really measures.
None of this means the test is useless for research. It does mean that a low score cannot be read as proof of difficulty understanding other people, let alone as evidence of autism.
Sex, age and culture
These are small average differences in huge samples. They show that age, sex, language and culture all shape scores, which is another reason one person's result needs careful interpretation.
Why vocabulary matters
Online eyes quizzes
Many sites host versions of the Eyes Test under names like "autism quiz eyes" or "autism test eyes emotion". Some use the official images; others use different faces, fewer items or invented scoring bands. A result from an unofficial version cannot be compared with research findings, and no version should be read as an autism result.
Who may use it, and where it lives
The adult Eyes Test, its instructions and translations are available from the University of Cambridge ARC tests page, for research use under the group's terms. SpectrumFox does not reproduce the images or answer options. If you are curious, read the official instructions and treat any score as a research curiosity.
Eyes Test, alexithymia and the double empathy idea
Two ideas help put Eyes Test results in context. The first is alexithymia, which affects a sizable minority of autistic people and also occurs in the wider population. If a person struggles to label their own emotions, choosing between subtle emotion words for a stranger's eyes is harder for reasons that are about vocabulary for feelings, not about caring or understanding. The second is the double empathy problem: the view that misunderstandings between autistic and non-autistic people run in both directions. A test built around how non-autistic people read faces captures only one side of that exchange.
Neither idea makes the Eyes Test meaningless. Together they explain why researchers now treat its scores with more care, and why a low score in a quiz should not shape how you see yourself.
If you scored low
Questions like these are more useful than the number itself. If you are wondering about autism because of everyday social experiences, a broader reflection and, if you want one, a professional assessment will tell you far more than a photo task.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test an autism test?
No. It is a research task designed to study recognizing mental states from the eye region. Autistic groups scored lower on average in early studies, but it has no diagnostic cut-off and is not used to diagnose autism. Only a qualified professional can diagnose autism.
What is a normal score on the Eyes Test?
There is no official normal range. Average scores vary with age, sex, language and the version used, and large studies report different averages. A single score is best treated as a curiosity, not a measure of social ability.
Why do some autistic people score well on the Eyes Test?
Group averages hide wide individual differences. Some research suggests the test reflects emotion vocabulary and alexithymia more than autism itself, and many autistic adults recognize emotions well from still images while finding live conversation harder.
Sources
- Greenberg DM, Warrier V, Abu-Akel A, et al. Sex and age differences in "theory of mind" across 57 countries using the English version of the "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2023;120(1):e2022385119. doi:10.1073/pnas.2022385119
- Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Hill J, Raste Y, Plumb I. The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2001;42(2):241 to 251. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00715
- Oakley BFM, Brewer R, Bird G, Catmur C. Theory of mind is not theory of emotion: a cautionary note on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2016;125(6):818 to 823. doi:10.1037/abn0000182
- Higgins WC, Savalei V, Polito V, Ross RM. Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test scores demonstrate poor structural properties in nine large non-clinical samples. Assessment. 2025 (online); 2026;33(2):204 to 220. doi:10.1177/10731911251328604
- Autism Research Centre, University of Cambridge. Eyes Test (Adult). Accessed 30 October 2026. Link