CAT-Q scoring and score ranges
Start the free assessment Free, about 10 to 15 minutes
Short answer
CAT-Q scoring rates each of 25 statements from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree), with five statements reverse scored, for a total from 25 to 175. Higher scores mean more camouflaging. Compensation runs 9 to 63, and masking and assimilation 8 to 56 each. The 2019 study published averages but no cut-off, so scores describe camouflaging, not autism.
If you have just taken the CAT-Q, you likely have a total and three factor scores. This page explains how those numbers are built, what the original study found, and how to read your own results without turning them into something they are not.
How each statement is scored
Every statement uses the same seven-point scale: 1 for strongly disagree up to 7 for strongly agree. Most statements describe camouflaging, so agreeing scores higher. Five statements are worded the other way, and their scores are flipped so that a high number always means more camouflaging. On the SpectrumFox version, this happens automatically and the reverse markers are hidden while you answer.
Score ranges
| Score | Statements | Lowest | Highest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 25 | 25 | 175 |
| Compensation | 9 | 9 | 63 |
| Masking | 8 | 8 | 56 |
| Assimilation | 8 | 8 | 56 |
Average scores in the original study
The 2019 paper reported average scores per statement rather than totals. To make them comparable with your result, we have multiplied each average by the number of statements. These are rough reference points from one online sample, not norms.
| Score | Autistic: mean per statement | Approximate total | Non-autistic: mean per statement | Approximate total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 4.79 | 120 | 3.48 | 87 |
| Compensation | 4.42 | 40 | 2.89 | 26 |
| Masking | 4.55 | 36 | 4.29 | 34 |
| Assimilation | 5.29 | 42 | 3.32 | 27 |
The masking result surprises many people. Both groups in the study reported fairly high masking, meaning that adjusting how you come across is common across people generally. The bigger differences were in compensation and assimilation: the effortful work of figuring out social rules, and the feeling of forcing yourself to fit in.
Is there a CAT-Q cut-off?
No. The authors did not publish a cut-off, and SpectrumFox does not invent one. Websites that label CAT-Q totals as "autistic range" or "high camouflaging" are adding their own interpretation. A score near the autistic average is not evidence of autism, and a lower score does not rule it out.
Reading your own result
- Look at the three factors first. Which one is highest, and does that match your experience?
- Compare your factor scores with the reference averages above, remembering they come from one sample.
- Notice context. Many people camouflage far more at work than at home.
- Think about cost. A high score with exhaustion is different from a high score that feels easy.
What each factor score suggests
A high compensation score usually reflects deliberate, effortful work: learning social rules from books or television, preparing topics in advance, copying the body language of people around you. A high masking score reflects ongoing self-monitoring, such as checking your face and voice, or hiding a stim or an interest. A high assimilation score reflects the push to join in when it does not feel natural, often with a sense of acting a part. The factors are related but distinct, and research suggests compensation and assimilation separate autistic and non-autistic groups more than masking does.
None of these strategies is good or bad in itself. Preparing for a meeting is useful for anyone. What matters is how much of your day the effort takes up, whether you have places where you can stop, and what it costs you afterward. Your factor scores can help you name the strategies; only you can judge the cost.
Retaking the CAT-Q
Scores were fairly stable over three months in the original study. If you retake it after a big change, such as a new job, a move or a period of unmasking, a different result is not an error. It may reflect a real shift in how much you are camouflaging in your current life.
Gender and CAT-Q scores
Scores and wellbeing
Studies have linked heavy camouflaging with anxiety, depression and exhaustion in autistic adults, though they cannot show that camouflaging alone causes these. If your score is high and you feel drained or low, consider talking with a professional, and look for settings where you can drop some of the effort. If you ever feel unsafe, use the crisis resources on this page.
Frequently asked questions
What is the CAT-Q score range?
Totals run from 25 to 175, because each of 25 statements scores 1 to 7. Compensation runs from 9 to 63, and masking and assimilation each run from 8 to 56. Higher always means more camouflaging after reverse scoring.
What is a high CAT-Q score?
There is no official threshold. In the 2019 study, autistic adults averaged about 120 and non-autistic adults about 87 on the total, by our conversion from per-statement averages. A score is best read against your own experience, not a fixed line.
Does a high CAT-Q score mean I am autistic?
No. The CAT-Q measures camouflaging, which non-autistic people also do, especially those with social anxiety or experience of stigma. It has no diagnostic cut-off. Only a qualified professional can diagnose autism.
Sources
- Hull L, Mandy W, Lai MC, Baron-Cohen S, Allison C, Smith P, Petrides KV. Development and validation of the Camouflaging Autistic Traits Questionnaire (CAT-Q). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2019;49(3):819 to 833. Open access under CC BY 4.0. doi:10.1007/s10803-018-3792-6
- Hull L, Lai MC, Baron-Cohen S, et al. Gender differences in self-reported camouflaging in autistic and non-autistic adults. Autism. 2020;24(2):352 to 363. doi:10.1177/1362361319864804